Analysis of Leadership
Leadership vs.
Management
Leadership and management
are both valuable competencies to an organization. They share similarities
between them, but they are different.
Similarities:
Leaders and managers, both
of whom aim to improve the organization, and are capable of working towards
achieving the objectives. They guide their teams in the right direction to
achieve the goals, and maintain by evaluation. They know the strengths and
weaknesses of team members and how to handle conflicts within the team
(Guardian, 2021).
Differences:
Managers give team members
instructions, provide them with resources, and delegate tasks. They are also
responsible to ensure that instructions and orders are followed by team
members.
Managers entail organizing,
analyzing team workflows; controlling and maintaining their performance, as
well as providing feedback.
Leaders set expectations,
and act as a role model (BFA, 2021). They influence and motivate team members
and encourage them to contribute toward the common goal. They are often
inspiring, helping others overcome barriers at work and figuring out ways to
solve problems.
Leaders think about the
needs and interests of the company, and they set goals that benefit both the
company and its employees.
Leadership Styles
Psychologist
Kurt Lewin developed his framework in the 1930s, it provided the foundation of
many of the approaches that followed afterwards (Lindberg,
2021). This theory is one of the
earliest, but still commonly cited today. It generally introduced three main
types of leadership:
Autocratic leadership, the leader gives clear instruction and
expectations to subordinates, focus on command and control, and also holds the
decision-making power.
Democratic Leadership, the leaders are open to different opinions, give guidance to the team and will also participate in the group work, they also encourage the members to participate in the decision-making process. Even under some circumstances, this leadership style could work a bit slow, but still recognized to be the most effective one. Laissez-Faire Leadership provides the team freedom to work independently with limited guidance and make decisions independently. This style is likely to work well with a team that is highly skilled, experienced and self-motivated. But the lack of direction and the confusion created during work could reduce productivity.
Personally, I would say
Democratic is the best appropriate leadership style that would work in most
industries. However, by considering all team members’ characteristics and
capabilities, a combination of leadership may be a better choice. I would
prefer a leader who embodies more democratic values and has a little laissez-faire
attitude.
Team members would benefit
and learn from leaders who participated and contributed to the group work. With
a little direction, collaboration among different voices and problem solving,
productivity could be guaranteed.
Leaders can let teams work and make decisions more on their own when the group is mature enough. In this way, team members may be able to take on more responsibility and have a chance to grow.
Leaders in the industry:
Bill Gates’s leadership style is
more democratic. He believes in the value of input from his employees for
overall company success (Agrawal, 2016). Bill Gates has a sense of innovation
and inspiration, he believed enthusiastic and hardworking attitude would drive
the success of the company. By delegating tasks to the team members, he was
able to fully exploit the abilities of each member of his team and utilize them
effectively.
Steve Jobs is more on the side of
autocratic leadership styles. He has strong leadership skills but rarely
collects input from subordinates and he is the one to make decisions. He was
seen as demanding on his team members and more of a dictator than an actual
leader (Agrawal, 2016). Steve Jobsis is a good motivator, he knows how to motivate
people and get them to be passionate, and work towards the objective with a
positive attitude.
Recommendation and Conclusion
For a company to achieve
success, both managers and leaders must be involved and work together closely toward
the common objectives. It should have management that is able to organize, and
coordinate the work of its staff, and leaders who can motivate them to achieve
their maximum potential.
There are a number of
different leadership styles, there is no superior or inferior. Leadership
styles can vary by industries, companies and even teams, it cannot be
standardized. A good leader will find him or herself shifting between styles
according to the people and work they are dealing with (Allen, 2018). It is essential for leaders to understand
their team members, including characteristics and level of knowledge and
skills, to then implement the appropriate leadership style.
References
Agrawal, A. (2016). Jobs or
Gates: Differences in Leadership. https://www.inc.com/aj-agrawal/jobs-or-gates-differences-in-leadership.html
Allen, T. (2018). What Is The Difference Between
Management And Leadership? https://www.forbes.com/sites/terinaallen/2018/10/09/what-is-the-difference-between-management-and-leadership/?sh=335b57e674d6
Business Finance Articles. (2021). Similarities
Between Leadership and Management. https://businessfinancearticles.org/similarities-between-leadership-and-management
Guardian. (2021). Management And Leadership
(Similarities). https://www.zambianguardian.com/management-and-leadership/
Kurt, L. (1939). Patterns of Aggressive behavior in
experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10:2
(1939:May) https://tu-dresden.de/mn/psychologie/ipep/lehrlern/ressourcen/dateien/lehre/lehramt/lehrveranstaltungen/Lehrer_Schueler_Interaktion_SS_2011/Lewin_1939_original.pdf?lang=en
Leadership & performance partners. (2019).
Lewin’s Leadership Theory Explained. https://leadershipandperformance.com.au/leadership-development/lewins-leadership-theory-explained/
Lindberg, C. (2021). Kurt Lewin Leadership Styles. https://www.leadershipahoy.com/kurt-lewin-leadership-styles/
Nayar, V. (2013). Three Differences Between
Managers and Leaders. https://hbr.org/2013/08/tests-of-a-leadership-transiti
"For a company to achieve success, both managers and leaders must be involved and work together closely toward the common objectives", and they also have good support from their employee / team member
ReplyDeleteyes I agree with that.
Delete